Taskonio
Structure without a system administrator
Small engineering teams that want to select sprint scope together, change framework without rebuilding a space, and keep assignments or mentions open until handled.
Taskonio vs Linear
Taskonio vs Linear
Compare deliberate sprint planning with an automated, highly polished product-development system built around cycles and projects.
Start freeThe best fit depends on what you want the tool to decide.
Linear
Choose breadth when the breadth is useful
Product and engineering organizations that prefer recurring automated cycles, polished issue operations, roadmaps, insights, and strong code-hosting workflows.
Decision criteria
Compare the operating model, not just the feature names.
01
Setup and administration
Both reduce Jira-style administration, but they encode different defaults.
Taskonio
Framework choice controls the modules and stages a team sees. Teams can switch between Sprint, Kanban, and no framework through guided remapping while keeping statuses editable.
Linear
Linear organizes work into workspaces and teams with configurable workflows, projects, initiatives, views, triage, and cycles. It stays opinionated while offering a growing set of workspace and enterprise controls.
02
Workflow and planning
Taskonio treats sprint commitment as an event; Linear treats cycles as a repeating operating rhythm.
Taskonio
The Planning module lets a team select candidate work, see live task and estimate totals, then start the sprint. At close, the team chooses whether unfinished work returns to backlog or moves forward.
Linear
Cycles repeat automatically on a configured schedule, can include cooldowns, and generally roll unfinished issues forward. Upcoming cycles and capacity signals reduce recurring setup work.
03
Hierarchy, views, and customization
Taskonio offers more work-type vocabulary; Linear offers broader product-planning surfaces.
Taskonio
Epics contain items, which can contain sub-items. Items and sub-items can be tasks, bugs, stories, features, improvements, experiments, or ideas. Modules support team-space table and board views.
Linear
Linear connects initiatives, projects, issues, parent and sub-issues, milestones, cycles, releases, and customer requests. Custom views can be saved and shared, while projects and initiatives support board or timeline perspectives.
04
Collaboration and notifications
Taskonio makes action persistence explicit; Linear offers a fast, configurable inbox workflow.
Taskonio
Assignments and mentions enter the Actions tab and remain until marked done. Informational activity goes to Updates and clears from the default unread view after it is seen.
Linear
Linear Inbox supports read state, delete, snooze, reminders, quick search, filters, property changes, and notification channels. It does not use Taskonio’s explicit Action-versus-Update completion model.
05
AI, MCP, and reporting
Taskonio narrows native AI to planning drafts; Linear is building AI across the development lifecycle.
Taskonio
Vibe Speccing and Vibe Breakdown focus on turning rough intent into reviewed specifications and typed work. MCP is available on every plan for agent access and analysis.
Linear
Linear provides an agent platform, Linear Agent, AI-supported triage and summaries, Insights, and an MCP server that can work with issues, projects, initiatives, updates, milestones, and relationships.
06
Automation and integrations
Linear is the stronger choice when code events should drive issue state.
Taskonio
Taskonio provides framework-aware behavior rather than a general-purpose rule builder, plus Slack, GitHub, and MCP integrations.
Linear
Linear provides cycle automation, GitHub and GitLab workflows, Slack collaboration, APIs, webhooks, importers, customer-request integrations, and other development-tool connections.
07
Pricing model and migration
Both have free entry points, but their limits and paid expansion differ.
Taskonio
Free includes unlimited tasks, members, storage, two team spaces, MCP, Actions and Updates, and guided CSV import. Native AI becomes Pro-only after beta.
Linear
Linear Free includes unlimited members but limits teams and issues. Paid tiers expand issue volume, teams, private access, advanced AI, Insights, integrations, governance, and onboarding support.
The detailed feature matrix
Expand this section when the buying conversation moves from workflow fit to specific capabilities.
Open the full feature matrixClose the full feature matrixDetailed product differences, including areas where Linear offers more breadth.
Workflow and structure
| Capability | Taskonio | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| Workflow setup | Choose Sprint, Kanban, or no framework. Stages adapt automatically and statuses remain editable. | Opinionated team workflows with configurable statuses, triage, projects, initiatives, and optional cycles. |
| Sprint planning | Select scope manually in Planning, see live task and estimate totals, then start the sprint deliberately. | Recurring 1 to 8 week cycles, automatic upcoming cycles, capacity signals, cooldowns, and automatic rollover rules. |
| Estimation | Estimate in hours, Fibonacci story points, or T-shirt sizes. Hours are estimates, not logged time. | Issue estimates feed cycle effort, capacity, and progress views. |
| Work hierarchy | Epics, items, and sub-items, with seven built-in engineering and product work types. | Initiatives, projects, issues, parent issues, sub-issues, milestones, releases, and customer requests. |
| Views | Team-space table and board views with local filter and display changes. | Shared custom views, list and board layouts, plus project and initiative timeline views. |
| Custom data | A focused set of built-in properties. No user-created custom fields. | A defined product data model with labels and supported properties rather than Jira-style arbitrary custom fields. |
Planning, focus, and intelligence
| Capability | Taskonio | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| Roadmaps and timelines | Epic views and dates, without a native timeline, Gantt chart, or roadmap visualization. | Initiatives and projects support roadmap planning, milestones, status updates, health, and timelines. |
| Dependencies | Basic blocking and blocked-by relationships. | Blocked, blocking, related, and duplicate issue relationships, with roadmap context. |
| Notification focus | Separate Actions and Updates. Assignments and mentions persist as Actions until deliberately completed. | Inbox with read state, snooze, delete, reminders, filters, quick search, and configurable delivery channels. |
| Native AI | Vibe Speccing and Vibe Breakdown create editable drafts. Decisions shows current and proposed values for human review. | Agent platform, Linear Agent, AI-supported triage, summaries, coding sessions, and other plan-dependent AI workflows. |
| MCP and external AI | MCP access is available on every plan for authorized work and analysis through a compatible AI tool. | An official MCP server supports issues and broader product-management workflows, with availability listed by plan. |
| Reporting | Live planning and sprint totals in the product, plus flexible analysis through an MCP-connected AI tool. | Cycle graphs, capacity signals, project updates, Pulse, and Linear Insights on eligible plans. |
Platform and adoption
| Capability | Taskonio | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| Automation | Framework-aware behavior is built in. There is no user-built rule engine. | Automated cycles plus GitHub and GitLab automations that can update issue workflow state. |
| Integration ecosystem | Slack and GitHub integrations connect conversations and development work. MCP connects compatible AI agents. | Strong development integrations, Slack workflows, APIs, webhooks, importers, and customer-support connections. |
| Docs and time tracking | Markdown descriptions, links, and attachments. No standalone wiki or native time logging. | Project and initiative documents are available; native time logging is not the product’s central model. |
| Plans and migration | Unlimited core work on Free, guided CSV mapping on every plan, and native AI on Pro after beta. | Free limits teams and issue volume; paid tiers add scale, private teams, Insights, advanced AI, integrations, and governance. |
Make the tradeoff explicit.
Choose Taskonio if
- Sprint planning should include an explicit candidate-scope step with live totals before commitment.
- Your teams may move between Sprint, Kanban, and backlog-only operation in the same space.
- Seven work types and three estimate modes better match how your team discusses product work.
- Assignments and mentions should remain persistent Actions rather than ordinary inbox entries.
Choose Linear if
- You want recurring cycles that create themselves and roll unfinished work automatically.
- Native product roadmaps, initiatives, milestones, project updates, and Insights are important.
- Git-based automation and a broad development-tool workflow are required now.
- Your team values keyboard-driven issue operations and Linear’s particular product-development conventions.
Migration
Bring Linear work into a different planning rhythm
Export Linear data to CSV, map supported fields to Taskonio properties, and choose the framework that matches how the team wants to plan next. Parent relationships can be preserved where the export represents them, while initiative, project, release, and integration-specific context may need restructuring.
- Import is available on every Taskonio plan.
- Map Linear issues to the Taskonio item types that express their intent.
- Decide whether Linear projects become epics or remain supporting context.
- Review cycle and project metadata because Taskonio’s Sprint workflow uses different stages.
See the Taskonio workflow behind the comparison.
Sprint planning
Sprint planning that doesn’t slow you down
Plan sprints in minutes with three focused modules - Backlog, Planning, and Sprint - plus live scope totals and flexible views for every planning conversation.
Explore featureCustom views
Your work, your way - custom views for every engineer
Create multiple table and board views across Backlog, Planning, Sprint, and Kanban, then keep adjustments local or share them with the team.
Explore featureInbox: Actions and Updates
Notifications that separate action from awareness
Keep assignments and mentions open until they are handled, while routine activity clears naturally after you read it.
Explore featureQuestions before you switch
View every comparisonDoes Taskonio automate sprints like Linear cycles?
No. Taskonio makes planning and sprint start deliberate. Linear automatically creates recurring cycles and generally rolls unfinished work forward.
Does Taskonio have a Linear-style roadmap?
Taskonio provides epic-based views and dates, but does not currently claim a native timeline or roadmap visualization.
Can Taskonio connect to AI coding tools?
Yes. Taskonio provides MCP access for compatible AI clients on every plan. Comparison pages describe the capability without publishing placeholder setup instructions.
How are notifications different?
Linear offers a capable inbox with snooze, reminders, filters, and channel controls. Taskonio uniquely separates persistent Actions from read-clearing Updates.
Can we import Linear data?
Yes. Export to CSV and use guided field mapping. Parent relationships can be preserved when represented in the source, while Linear-specific planning concepts may need restructuring.
Try Taskonio with your team’s real work.
Start free, import a CSV when you are ready, and keep the workflow as simple as the team needs.